August 21, 2011
Lawyers gear up for appeal in $91.5 million Charleston nursing home case
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Earlier this month, a jury awarded Tom Douglas and his family $91.5 million after deciding that staff in a Charleston nursing home caused the death of his dementia-stricken mother by not providing her enough food and water over a span of about three weeks in 2009.

As expected, lawyers for both Douglas and Heartland of Charleston are gearing up for a likely appeal to the state Supreme Court on grounds that the huge jury award may be subject to the state's controversial medical malpractice caps.

If the justices find that the caps apply, Douglas' nearly $100 million verdict may be reduced to $500,000 in non-economic damages, which include pain and suffering and punitive damages that make up the bulk of Douglas' award.

Douglas' lawyers are optimistic that the caps will not apply to the case, and claim that the nurse aides are not necessarily considered "health care providers" under the caps' definition.

"Understand what people are doing in the nursing home setting," Michael Fuller, of Mississippi-based McHugh Fuller, told the Gazette. "Most of the care is provided by the [nursing aides]. Aides don't necessarily constitute health care providers."

Fuller's firm, which represented Douglas, has filed more than a dozen lawsuits against Heartland of Charleston's umbrella corporation HCR ManorCare Inc. this year alone.

He said that because nursing aides are not qualified to give medication to patients or provide assistance in the same way that a licensed physician could, little to no medical negligence actually occurred in the Douglas case.

Douglas' mother Dorothy, 87, died because the aides at Heartland didn't keep her properly hydrated, which ultimately caused her death, he said. An individual doesn't need a medical license to provide a person their basic needs, he added.

"There's nothing 'mediciney' about that," Fuller said. "Common sense dictates you need to get them some water or they're going to dehydrate."

The jury seemed to agree.

The cap law also requires juries to determine the extent of medical negligence that occurred versus ordinary negligence. They found that Heartland and ManorCare were 80 percent at fault in ordinary negligence and 20 percent at fault in medical negligence. Douglas' lawyers argued throughout the trial that Dorothy's death was caused by ManorCare executives' repeated failure to keep their nursing homes properly staffed.

"In general, the medical malpractice act applies to health care services that are rendered to a patient," said Paul T. Farrell Jr., president of the West Virginia Association For Justice. "That's the definition of the statute. That's a very narrow application of what the cap applied to."

Fuller's firm has asked the association to join in the appeal.

In 2003, state lawmakers, citing a fear that high medical malpractice insurance premiums were diverting doctors from West Virginia, implemented $500,000 caps for non-economic damages on medical malpractice lawsuits involving wrongful death and other serious cases.

Article Preview

This article is available only to our premium digital content subscribers.

Lawyers gear up for appeal in $91.5 million Charleston nursing home case

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Earlier this month, a jury awarded Tom Douglas and his family $91.5 million after deciding that staff in a Charleston nursing home caused the death of his dementia-stricken mother by not providing her enough food and water over a span of about three weeks in 2009.

As expected, lawyers for both Douglas and Heartland of Charleston are gearing up for a likely appeal to the state Supreme Court on grounds that the huge jury award may be subject to the state's controversial medical malpractice caps.

If the justices find that the caps apply, Douglas' nearly $100 million verdict may be reduced to $500,000 in non-economic damages, which include pain and suffering and punitive damages that make up the bulk of Douglas' award.

Douglas' lawyers are optimistic that the caps will not apply to the case, and claim that the nurse aides are not necessarily considered "health care providers" under the caps' definition.

"Understand what people are doing in the nursing home setting," Michael Fuller, of Mississippi-based McHugh Fuller, told the Gazette. "Most of the care is provided by the [nursing aides]. Aides don't necessarily constitute health care providers."

Fuller's firm, which represented Douglas, has filed more than a dozen lawsuits against Heartland of Charleston's umbrella corporation HCR ManorCare Inc. this year alone.

He said that because nursing aides are not qualified to give medication to patients or provide assistance in the same way that a licensed physician could, little to no medical negligence actually occurred in the Douglas case.

Douglas' mother Dorothy, 87, died because the aides at Heartland didn't keep her properly hydrated, which ultimately caused her death, he said. An individual doesn't need a medical license to provide a person their basic needs, he added.

"There's nothing 'mediciney' about that," Fuller said. "Common sense dictates you need to get them some water or they're going to dehydrate."

The jury seemed to agree.

The cap law also requires juries to determine the extent of medical negligence that occurred versus ordinary negligence. They found that Heartland and ManorCare were 80 percent at fault in ordinary negligence and 20 percent at fault in medical negligence. Douglas' lawyers argued throughout the trial that Dorothy's death was caused by ManorCare executives' repeated failure to keep their nursing homes properly staffed.

"In general, the medical malpractice act applies to health care services that are rendered to a patient," said Paul T. Farrell Jr., president of the West Virginia Association For Justice. "That's the definition of the statute. That's a very narrow application of what the cap applied to."

Fuller's firm has asked the association to join in the appeal.

In 2003, state lawmakers, citing a fear that high medical malpractice insurance premiums were diverting doctors from West Virginia, implemented $500,000 caps for non-economic damages on medical malpractice lawsuits involving wrongful death and other serious cases.

1 Day Online Only
$0.99
Click here to purchase a one day subscription.
1 Month Online Only
$9.99
Click here to sign up for a one month subscription.
1 Month Online + Print Delivery
$31.99
Click here to sign up for our Premium subscription package.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here